DE WERELD NU

Russiagate – publicatie Durham-rapport is aanstaande

Russiagate, USA2024

Met een aanstaande publicatie en enige aanklachten tegen betrokkenen is Russiagate weer helemaal terug in focus.

Special Counsel John Durham is dan weliswaar een jaar later dan werd gehoopt, de publicatie van zijn bevindingen houdt Washington wel degelijk wakker.

U.S. Attorney John Durham’s investigation has been slow in coming, but on Friday, a report surfaced that he is pitching evidence to a grand jury in an investigation started back in May 2019. The Durham investigation is now longer in duration than former special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, and many people long forgot that Durham — made a special counsel at the end of the Trump administration — was even still in the game.
The report in The Wall Street Journal said Durham is presenting evidence against FBI agents and possibly others in the use of false information or tips at the start of the Russia investigation in 2016. Those “others” could include a virtual who’s who of Washington politics, and even if they are not indicted, Durham could implicate some of the most powerful figures in politics in his final report, expected in the coming months.

Een opfrisser voor wie vergeten  was hoe de stand van zaken is:

It was disclosed in October, for instance, that President Obama was briefed by his CIA director, John Brennan, on July 28, 2016, on intelligence suggesting that Hillary Clinton planned to tie then-candidate Donald Trump to Russia as “a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server.” The date was significant because the Russia investigation was initiated July 31, 2016, just three days later.
Throughout the campaign, the Clinton campaign denied any involvement in the creation of the so-called Steele dossier’s allegations of Trump-Russia connections. However, weeks after the election, journalists discovered that the Clinton campaign hid payments for the dossier made to a research firm, Fusion GPS, as legal fees” among the $5.6 million paid to the campaign’s law firm. New York Times reporter Ken Vogel said at the time that Clinton lawyer Marc Elias, with the law firm of Perkins Coie, denied involvement in the anti-Trump dossier. When Vogel tried to report the story, he said, Elias pushed back vigorously, saying ‘You (or your sources) are wrong.’” Times reporter Maggie Haberman declared “Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year.
It was not just reporters who asked the Clinton campaign about its role in the Steele dossier. John Podesta, Clinton’s campaign chairman, was questioned by Congress and denied categorically any contractual agreement with Fusion GPS. Sitting beside him was Elias, who reportedly said nothing to correct the misleading information given to Congress.
It was later revealed that American intelligence viewed Steele as unreliable and believed his dossier was used by Russian intelligence to plant disinformation. Later reports show that Steele shopped the information to any reporters who would listen before the election and that there was an effort to get the information to trusted figures in the Justice Department.
This cross-pollination between the campaign and the Justice Department was evident in the strange role of Bruce Ohr, a senior Justice official who was latedemoted for concealing his meetings with people pushing the Steele dossier; his wife, Nellie Ohr, worked for Fusion GPS as a researcher on Trump’s purported connections to Russia. Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz subsequently found that Bruce Ohr acted improperly and committed “consequential errors in judgment.”

En het zijn niet alleen prominente figuren die besproken zullen worden:

Others are reported in some media accounts to be in Durham’s crosshairs, including an analyst at the liberal Brookings Institution, Igor Danchenko, who was a source for part of the dossier and the subject of a Durham subpoena. Danchenko has been linked to a source viewed by American intelligence as a conduit for Russian disinformation and reportedly was investigated as a possible national security threat, according to at least one news report.
Durham also is reportedly looking into information concerning Alfa Bank, a privately owned commercial bank in Russia. That information led to possible access to the Trump campaign server. The Alfa Bank controversy is likely to make a number of powerful people particularly uneasy. Clinton campaign-linked figures such as Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson allegedly pushed the debunked claim that the Trump campaign had a server linked directly to the bank, which in turn was linked to Vladimir Putin and his cronies. The Alfa Bank conspiracy reportedly was pitched to the Justice Department, including in contacts with Bruce Ohr.

Is het hiermee afgelopen? Mogelijk, maar niet waarschijnlijk:

For many individuals, the statute of limitations may have passed on any alleged crimes. But the truth brought to light in any final report could result a public indictment of sorts.
Attorney General Merrick Garland may face some pressure to refuse to reauthorize a continuation of the Durham investigation, but he is likely to continue that support. After all, the Mueller investigation and various damaging investigations targeting Trump officials were approved and protected by his predecessor, William Barr.

De risico’s voor machthebbers in Washington zijn nog steeds aanzienlijk:

The final fight may be over the report itself. Many in Congress and the media may not want it to see the light of day since it is likely to be an indictment not just of the FBI but of the establishment and an enabling media. Yet these same figures demanded “full transparency” over the Mueller report, including secret grand jury material barred from release under federal law. Even in a city that lives on political spin, reversing that narrative to demand secrecy or major redactions may be difficult to achieve in front of an increasingly distrustful public.

Al is het maar omdat veel Amerikanen weinig over Durhams werk vernomen hebben, en dat nu ter sprake komt. Het Amerikaanse vertrouwen in de media staat al niet op een hoog peil, en dit rapport kan dat vertrouwen een stevige extra dreun geven.

De precieze inhoud wordt interessant, en hoe het in de Amerikaanse MSM zal figureren is dat minstens zo. Na het Afghanistan-debacle is de steun voor president Joe |Biden geen automatisme meer, zelfs niet bij diens traditionele supporters.


Meer lezen? Op VoL leest u een ander relaas over Russiagate, The Memo, USA2016Midterms2018, Spygate, de Deep State en Trump, en vanuit andere bronnen dan de bevooroordeelde verhalen van NOS en RTL. Vanaf 11 mei wordt het steekwoord dat we voor deze reeks gebruiken overigens Obamagate. Geen nieuw woord, maar nu met een vaster omlijnde betekenis.

5 reacties

  1. Xantil schreef:

    Die Durham is wel door William Barr benoemd, die later een ongelofelijk stuk stront bleek te zijn.
    Het kan dus alle kanten uit…

  2. carthago schreef:

    @xantiil.Yep.Trump werd heimelijk opgehangen door z’n eigen attorney general .De rot in de amerikaanse “politiek” is immens .Watergate was nog netjes hiermee vergeleken.

  3. Bas schreef:

    Waarom zou het Durham rapport nu voor vuurwerk gaan zorgen als er al 7 maanden een door deep state geplaatste demente fraudeur op de presidentiele stoel zit, na een verkiezingsfraude die zijn gelijke niet kent? Denkt iemand dat CNN, facebook, twitter, the wapo en overige demonrats en rino’s nu opeens gaan erkennen dat ze de zaak mega belazerd hebben? Dacht het niet. Een staatsgreep, dat hangt er in de lucht in de US of A.

  4. Gerrit Joost schreef:

    Goh, dacht nooit meer iets van Durham te zullen horen. Toch nog een kleine kans op gerechtigheid? Barr heeft in ieder geval zeer teleurgesteld!

  5. Cool Pete schreef:

    Zeer informatieve update. Goede geheugen-opfrisser.
    Dank.

    Het rapport Durham is natuurlijk van groot belang: als de V.S. nog een rechtstaat zouden zijn.
    Maar de ‘Deep State’ : CIA, FBI, NSA, Pentagon, DoJ, high tech, big fin – m.m.v. de corporate networks, hebben alle touwtjes vast in handen;
    en die sturen de “democrats” aan.